| 한 줄 해석 시험지 세트 수 | 1 |
| 한글 빈칸 시험지 세트 수 | 2 |
| 영어 빈칸 시험지 세트 수 | 2 |
| 영어 빈칸 랜덤 시험지 세트 수 | 2 |
| 영어 스크램블 시험지 세트 수 | 2 |
| 소요 포인트 | 10포인트/1지문 |
| PDF 출력 설정 |
|---|
| # | 영어 지문 | 지문 출처 |
|---|---|---|
| 지문 1 |
The advent of CRISPR gene editing has revived the debate over genetically modifying future generations.↵
↵ This technology allows for precise alterations in DNA, leading to discussions on whether it should be used to engineer traits in unborn children, whose modified genes would be inherited by all their descendants.↵ ↵ While gene therapy for treating diseases is widely supported, human germline modification has been legally banned in many countries due to its risks and ethical concerns.↵ ↵ The primary issues include unintended mutations, long-term health effects, and the potential for worsening social inequalities.↵ ↵ Moreover, germline editing does not address existing medical needs but rather aims to influence future genetic outcomes, raising profound social and ethical questions.↵ ↵ Alternatives like pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) offer safer ways to avoid genetic diseases without altering human germlines.↵ ↵ Permitting germline gene editing could lead to its misuse for enhancement purposes, creating a market-based eugenics and increasing discrimination.↵ ↵ Given these risks, society should carefully consider the implications and resist opening this Pandora's box. |