제목(영) 유형 시험지 세트 수 0.5포인트/1지문,1세트 | 0 |
제목(한) 유형 시험지 세트 수 0.5포인트/1지문,1세트 | 0 |
주제(영) 유형 시험지 세트 수 0.5포인트/1지문,1세트 | 1 |
주제(한) 유형 시험지 세트 수 0.5포인트/1지문,1세트 | 0 |
일치(영) 유형 시험지 세트 수 1포인트/1지문,1세트 | 0 |
일치(한) 유형 시험지 세트 수 1포인트/1지문,1세트 | 0 |
불일치(영) 유형 시험지 세트 수 1포인트/1지문,1세트 | 0 |
불일치(한) 유형 시험지 세트 수 1포인트/1지문,1세트 | 1 |
일치개수(영) 유형 시험지 세트 수 1포인트/1지문,1세트 | 1 |
일치개수(한) 유형 시험지 세트 수 1포인트/1지문,1세트 | 0 |
순서 유형 시험지 세트 수 1포인트/1지문,1세트 | 1 |
문장빈칸-하 유형 시험지 세트 수 1포인트/1지문,1세트 | 0 |
문장빈칸-중 유형 시험지 세트 수 1포인트/1지문,1세트 | 0 |
문장빈칸-상 유형 시험지 세트 수 1포인트/1지문,1세트 | 0 |
흐름-하 유형 시험지 세트 수 1포인트/1지문,1세트 | 0 |
흐름-중 유형 시험지 세트 수 1포인트/1지문,1세트 | 0 |
흐름-상 유형 시험지 세트 수 1포인트/1지문,1세트 | 1 |
위치-하 유형 시험지 세트 수 1포인트/1지문,1세트 | 0 |
위치-중 유형 시험지 세트 수 1포인트/1지문,1세트 | 0 |
위치-상 유형 시험지 세트 수 1포인트/1지문,1세트 | 1 |
밑줄 의미 추론 유형 시험지 세트 수 1포인트/1지문,1세트 | 1 |
어법-하 유형 시험지 세트 수 1포인트/1지문,1세트 | 0 |
어법-중 유형 시험지 세트 수 1포인트/1지문,1세트 | 0 |
어법-상 유형 시험지 세트 수 1포인트/1지문,1세트 | 0 |
어휘-하 유형 시험지 세트 수 1포인트/1지문,1세트 | 0 |
어휘-중 유형 시험지 세트 수 1포인트/1지문,1세트 | 0 |
어휘-상 유형 시험지 세트 수 1포인트/1지문,1세트 | 0 |
요약문완성 유형 시험지 세트 수 1포인트/1지문,1세트 | 0 |
서술형조건-하 유형 시험지 세트 수 1포인트/1지문,1세트 | 0 |
서술형조건-중 유형 시험지 세트 수 1포인트/1지문,1세트 | 0 |
서술형조건-상 유형 시험지 세트 수 1포인트/1지문,1세트 | 0 |
종합 시험지 세트 수 및 포함 유형 설정 1포인트/1지문,1세트 | 0 |
PDF 출력 설정 |
---|
# | 영어 지문 | 지문 출처 |
---|---|---|
지문 1 |
It's good to see you, everyone! I'm Dr. Edward Wilson, an evolutionary biologist. Thank you for inviting me here today. On my way, I had trouble locating this room. Luckily, a friendly student came up to me and walked me here. It's fascinating how, in situations like this, we want to help someone in need. Now, this raises some interesting questions: where does our friendliness come from, and why is it important? To answer these questions, I'd like to tell you about my childhood companion dog, Sparky. When we played with a ball, I noticed that he responded well to my gestures.
|
|
지문 2 |
The responsive behavior of dogs also caught the attention of an evolutionary anthropologist, Brian Hare. He conducted an experiment to see how dogs would respond to human gestures compared to wolves, who share the same common ancestor. He placed two cups on the ground with food hidden under only one of them. When he pointed to the cup with the food, the dogs found it easily. The wolves, however, struggled and chose cups at random, paying no attention to his gestures. Dr. Hare concluded that the dogs' ability to read human gestures allowed them to perform better than the wolves. He explained that dogs, unlike wolves, have developed communicative skills with humans and a sense of friendliness. This explanation sounds reasonable according to several evolutionary biologists. They say that from the common ancestors of these two species, those that acted friendly toward humans evolved into dogs, and those that didn't became wolves. Furthermore, Dr. Hare suggested that the friendly nature of dogs probably provided them a survival advantage that allowed their population to grow larger than that of wolves.
|
|
지문 3 |
I'll give you another example of how friendliness is related to survival. Dr. Hare and his colleagues designed an experiment with chimpanzees and bonobos. Although the two are genetically similar, they are different in nature. To study their cooperative behavior, Dr. Hare's team set up a device which required two individuals to pull both ends of a rope at the same time in order to access food on a board. When placed with partners that the chimpanzees knew, they were able to work together to get the food. However, when paired with new partners, the chimpanzees usually failed to get the food, and when they occasionally succeeded, they did not share the food with their partner. The bonobos, on the other hand, got along much better than the chimpanzees. They solved the problem regardless of which individual they were paired with, and they were also more willing to share the food. This research shows that bonobos have a cooperative and friendly nature. Experts suggest that their nature has helped their species survive. Without these characteristics, they could have faced extinction.
|
|
지문 4 |
Now let's turn our attention to ourselves, Homo sapiens. How have we managed to survive for so long? Neanderthals existed together with Homo sapiens until about 40,000 years ago, and they were known to be intelligent and physically superior to Homo sapiens. Neanderthals were able to make tools and fire and had strong bodies with well-developed muscles and broad shoulders. Despite these attributes, however, it was Homo sapiens who ultimately survived and thrived. One possible explanation is that our ancestors lived in larger communities that promoted cooperation and the free exchange of knowledge, while Neanderthals tended to live in smaller groups. These social differences may have given Homo sapiens a competitive advantage over Neanderthals, allowing them to adapt to an ever-changing environment.
|
|
지문 5 |
In our competitive society, many people believe that only the biggest or the strongest can survive and thrive. However, I propose an alternative view: kindness is the key to success. Throughout history, cooperation has played a crucial role in human progress. We can use the power of our natural kindness to communicate and collaborate with different individuals. Instead of constantly trying to outcompete others, we should recognize the value of mutual support. When people work together, they achieve more than they could alone. We can all benefit from fostering a culture of kindness and cooperation.
|
|
지문 6 |
I'd like to end this talk with a message. Think of our society as a bouquet. Just as each flower adds to the beauty when it harmonizes with the others, each person can contribute to a more beautiful world when they cooperate. A community built on kindness and cooperation creates a more sustainable and prosperous society. When we support one another, we can overcome challenges more effectively. Rather than focusing on competition, let's embrace collaboration as a means of growth. By being kind and working together, we can truly flourish. Thank you for your attention.
|
문장빈칸-하 | 문장빈칸-중 | 문장빈칸-상 | 문장 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
지문 1 | 1. | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | It's good to see you, everyone! |
2. | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | I'm Dr. Edward Wilson, an evolutionary biologist. | |
3. | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | Thank you for inviting me here today. | |
4. | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | On my way, I had trouble locating this room. | |
5. | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | Luckily, a friendly student came up to me and walked me here. | |
6. | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | It's fascinating how, in situations like this, we want to help someone in need. | |
7. | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | Now, this raises some interesting questions: where does our friendliness come from, and why is it important? | |
8. | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | To answer these questions, I'd like to tell you about my childhood companion dog, Sparky. | |
9. | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | When we played with a ball, I noticed that he responded well to my gestures. | |
지문 2 | 1. | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | The responsive behavior of dogs also caught the attention of an evolutionary anthropologist, Brian Hare. |
2. | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | He conducted an experiment to see how dogs would respond to human gestures compared to wolves, who share the same common ancestor. | |
3. | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | He placed two cups on the ground with food hidden under only one of them. | |
4. | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | When he pointed to the cup with the food, the dogs found it easily. | |
5. | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | The wolves, however, struggled and chose cups at random, paying no attention to his gestures. | |
6. | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | Dr. Hare concluded that the dogs' ability to read human gestures allowed them to perform better than the wolves. | |
7. | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | He explained that dogs, unlike wolves, have developed communicative skills with humans and a sense of friendliness. | |
8. | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | This explanation sounds reasonable according to several evolutionary biologists. | |
9. | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | They say that from the common ancestors of these two species, those that acted friendly toward humans evolved into dogs, and those that didn't became wolves. | |
10. | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | Furthermore, Dr. Hare suggested that the friendly nature of dogs probably provided them a survival advantage that allowed their population to grow larger than that of wolves. | |
지문 3 | 1. | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | I'll give you another example of how friendliness is related to survival. |
2. | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | Dr. Hare and his colleagues designed an experiment with chimpanzees and bonobos. | |
3. | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | Although the two are genetically similar, they are different in nature. | |
4. | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | To study their cooperative behavior, Dr. Hare's team set up a device which required two individuals to pull both ends of a rope at the same time in order to access food on a board. | |
5. | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | When placed with partners that the chimpanzees knew, they were able to work together to get the food. | |
6. | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | However, when paired with new partners, the chimpanzees usually failed to get the food, and when they occasionally succeeded, they did not share the food with their partner. | |
7. | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | The bonobos, on the other hand, got along much better than the chimpanzees. | |
8. | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | They solved the problem regardless of which individual they were paired with, and they were also more willing to share the food. | |
9. | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | This research shows that bonobos have a cooperative and friendly nature. | |
10. | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | Experts suggest that their nature has helped their species survive. | |
11. | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | Without these characteristics, they could have faced extinction. | |
지문 4 | 1. | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | Now let's turn our attention to ourselves, Homo sapiens. |
2. | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | How have we managed to survive for so long? | |
3. | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | Neanderthals existed together with Homo sapiens until about 40,000 years ago, and they were known to be intelligent and physically superior to Homo sapiens. | |
4. | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | Neanderthals were able to make tools and fire and had strong bodies with well-developed muscles and broad shoulders. | |
5. | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | Despite these attributes, however, it was Homo sapiens who ultimately survived and thrived. | |
6. | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | One possible explanation is that our ancestors lived in larger communities that promoted cooperation and the free exchange of knowledge, while Neanderthals tended to live in smaller groups. | |
7. | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | These social differences may have given Homo sapiens a competitive advantage over Neanderthals, allowing them to adapt to an ever-changing environment. | |
지문 5 | 1. | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | In our competitive society, many people believe that only the biggest or the strongest can survive and thrive. |
2. | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | However, I propose an alternative view: kindness is the key to success. | |
3. | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | Throughout history, cooperation has played a crucial role in human progress. | |
4. | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | We can use the power of our natural kindness to communicate and collaborate with different individuals. | |
5. | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | Instead of constantly trying to outcompete others, we should recognize the value of mutual support. | |
6. | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | When people work together, they achieve more than they could alone. | |
7. | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | We can all benefit from fostering a culture of kindness and cooperation. | |
지문 6 | 1. | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | I'd like to end this talk with a message. |
2. | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | Think of our society as a bouquet. | |
3. | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | Just as each flower adds to the beauty when it harmonizes with the others, each person can contribute to a more beautiful world when they cooperate. | |
4. | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | A community built on kindness and cooperation creates a more sustainable and prosperous society. | |
5. | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | When we support one another, we can overcome challenges more effectively. | |
6. | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | Rather than focusing on competition, let's embrace collaboration as a means of growth. | |
7. | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | By being kind and working together, we can truly flourish. | |
8. | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | Thank you for your attention. |